Ridder is known as a water jet cutting specialist: Water jets deliver an almost unimaginable pressure (3,800 bar) to separate metals and plastics. The advantages of the "cold" process are that no harmful emissions develop during cutting and that the cutting surface is given a perfect finish even without rework. And there is no distortion in the cutting.
Ridder originally developed systems with a cutting table for 2D machining. Later, Waricut-series 3D linear robot systems that moved on vertical axes were added. But this is the largest machine that Ridder has put into operation to date:
The Anssems Group, based in the Netherlands, has ordered a five-axis water jet cutting machine with a cutting volume of 32,050 x 5,050 x 1,900mm (X/Y/Z axis) for horse trailer production. Two bridges, each with a 3D cutting head, move on 32-metre linear robot axes. The machine is divided into four cabins so that the two cutting heads can each process one component while the other two cabins are being changed over. This ensures continuous system utilisation. Each cutting head can move to all four cabins, ensuring high flexibility and availability.
The water jet cutting machine's task in production will be to process the glass-fibre reinforced plastic superstructures that were laminated and formed in the previous work steps and make door cut-outs in the horse trailer, for instance.It achieves very high precision. While the systems usually work with an accuracy of ≤ ± 20µm per metre, the long travels mean that this system has an accuracy of 50µm. The Ridder design engineers had to solve the problem of supplying the cutting heads with energy, signals, compressed air, and (of course) water. The high linear axis maximum travel speeds (20m/min) also had to be taken into account. But the biggest problem was the long travel. Given these lengths, the chain's upper run is especially likely to simply rest on the lower run (the gliding energy chain principle). This system could not thus glide for two reasons: The heavy filling and long travel distance would have generated too much friction. And the high-pressure line for the water supply requires a larger bend radius, so the "chain on chain" principle was out of the question.